Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 110.3% against 83.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 27.2%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.3% | 32.0% | 78.3% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 110.3% | 92.1% | 18.2% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Papua New Guinea, at 110.3% against 83.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 27.2%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.