Papua New Guinea vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Papua New Guinea
110.3%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
163.2%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
2nd
Timor-Leste rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 163.2% against 110.3% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 52.9%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.5 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.3% | 163.2% | 52.9% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 110.3% | 163.2% | 52.9% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Papua New Guinea or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 163.2% against 110.3% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste?
- 52.9%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 2nd and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.