Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, New Zealand or Palestine, State of?

New Zealand, at 27.2% against 27.0% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.

How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Palestine, State of?

16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Zealand vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Cost

New Zealand

27.2%

in 2019

Palestine, State of

27.0%

in 2019

New Zealand rank

99th

Palestine, State of rank

102nd

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

New Zealand
Palestine, State of

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 27.2% against 27.0% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

New Zealand ranks 99th and Palestine, State of ranks 102nd of 191 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Zealand	Palestine, State of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	22.1%	27.0%	4.9%	Palestine, State of
2010s	26.2%	27.0%	0.8%	Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, New Zealand or Palestine, State of?: New Zealand, at 27.2% against 27.0% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between New Zealand and Palestine, State of?: 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Palestine, State of?: 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do New Zealand and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?: New Zealand ranks 99th and Palestine, State of ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Cost. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/new-zealand/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/new-zealand/west-bank-and-gaza/">New Zealand vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Cost</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit: % of claim
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.