New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
New Zealand
27.2%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
27.5%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
99th
Saudi Arabia rank
96th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- New Zealand
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 27.5% against 27.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 99th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.1% | 27.5% | 5.4% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 26.2% | 27.5% | 1.3% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 27.5% against 27.2% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.3%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- New Zealand ranks 99th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.