Netherlands vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Netherlands
23.9%
in 2019
Samoa
24.4%
in 2019
Netherlands rank
122nd
Samoa rank
119th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Netherlands
  • Samoa
0510152025200320112019

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 24.4% against 23.9% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.5%.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 119th of 188 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 24.4% 24.4% 0.0%
2010s 23.9% 24.4% 0.4% Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Netherlands or Samoa?
Samoa, at 24.4% against 23.9% in Netherlands as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Netherlands and Samoa?
0.5%, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Samoa?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Netherlands and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Netherlands ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 119th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.