Nepal vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Nepal
27.3%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
27.5%
in 2019
Nepal rank
97th
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Nepal
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 27.5% against 27.3% in Nepal, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 97th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 190 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.8% | 27.5% | 0.7% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 26.9% | 27.5% | 0.6% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Nepal or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 27.5% against 27.3% in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Nepal and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.2%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Nepal ranks 97th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.