Nepal vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Nepal
27.3%
in 2019
New Zealand
27.2%
in 2019
Nepal rank
98th
New Zealand rank
99th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Nepal
- New Zealand
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 27.3% against 27.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.8% | 22.1% | 4.7% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 26.9% | 26.2% | 0.6% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Nepal or New Zealand?
- Nepal, at 27.3% against 27.2% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Nepal and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Nepal ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.