Mexico vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Mexico
33.0%
in 2019
South Africa
33.2%
in 2019
Mexico rank
68th
South Africa rank
67th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Mexico
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 33.2% against 33.0% in Mexico, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Africa ahead.
Mexico ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 67th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.0% | 33.2% | 1.2% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 32.9% | 33.2% | 0.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Mexico or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 33.2% against 33.0% in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Mexico and South Africa?
- 0.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Mexico ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.