Mauritius vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Mauritius
25.0%
in 2019
Tajikistan
25.5%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
118th
Tajikistan rank
116th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Mauritius
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 25.5% against 25.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 118th and Tajikistan ranks 116th of 191 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 25.5% | 9.2% | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 25.5% | 3.1% | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Mauritius or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 25.5% against 25.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Mauritius and Tajikistan?
- 0.5%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Mauritius ranks 118th and Tajikistan ranks 116th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.