Marshall Islands vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Marshall Islands
32.1%
in 2019
South Africa
33.2%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
70th
South Africa rank
67th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Marshall Islands
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 33.2% against 32.1% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 1.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 70th and South Africa ranks 67th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.1% | 33.2% | 1.1% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 32.1% | 33.2% | 1.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Marshall Islands or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 33.2% against 32.1% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Marshall Islands and South Africa?
- 1.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Marshall Islands ranks 70th and South Africa ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.