Marshall Islands vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Marshall Islands
32.1%
in 2019
Mexico
33.0%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
69th
Mexico rank
67th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 33.0% against 32.1% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 69th and Mexico ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.1% | 32.0% | 0.1% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 32.1% | 32.9% | 0.8% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Marshall Islands or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 33.0% against 32.1% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 0.9%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Marshall Islands ranks 69th and Mexico ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.