Malta vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Malta
21.5%
in 2019
Tunisia
21.8%
in 2019
Malta rank
146th
Tunisia rank
143rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Malta
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 21.8% against 21.5% in Malta, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Malta or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 21.8% against 21.5% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Malta and Tunisia?
- 0.3%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Malta ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.