Malta vs Somalia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Malta
21.5%
in 2019
Somalia
21.4%
in 2019
Malta rank
146th
Somalia rank
147th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Malta
- Somalia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 21.5% against 21.4% in Somalia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 146th and Somalia ranks 147th of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Malta or Somalia?
- Malta, at 21.5% against 21.4% in Somalia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Malta and Somalia?
- 0.1%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Somalia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Somalia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Malta ranks 146th and Somalia ranks 147th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.