Malta vs Qatar: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Malta
21.5%
in 2019
Qatar
21.6%
in 2019
Malta rank
144th
Qatar rank
143rd

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Malta
  • Qatar
05101520200720132019

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 21.6% against 21.5% in Malta, a difference of 0.1%.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 144th and Qatar ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Malta or Qatar?
Qatar, at 21.6% against 21.5% in Malta as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Malta and Qatar?
0.1%, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Qatar?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Malta and Qatar rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Malta ranks 144th and Qatar ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.