Malaysia vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Malaysia
37.9%
in 2019
Suriname
37.1%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
49th
Suriname rank
51st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Malaysia
- Suriname
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 37.9% against 37.1% in Suriname, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.
Malaysia ranks 49th and Suriname ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.5% | 37.1% | 9.6% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 34.8% | 37.1% | 2.3% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Malaysia or Suriname?
- Malaysia, at 37.9% against 37.1% in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Malaysia and Suriname?
- 0.8%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Malaysia ranks 49th and Suriname ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.