Malawi vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Malawi
69.1%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
78.9%
in 2019
Malawi rank
11th
Solomon Islands rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Malawi
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 78.9% against 69.1% in Malawi, a difference of 9.8%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 11th and Solomon Islands ranks 9th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 142.4% | 78.9% | 63.5% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 76.6% | 78.9% | 2.3% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Malawi or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 78.9% against 69.1% in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Malawi and Solomon Islands?
- 9.8%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Malawi ranks 11th and Solomon Islands ranks 9th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.