Madagascar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Madagascar
33.6%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
33.5%
in 2019
Madagascar rank
65th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
66th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Madagascar
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 33.6% against 33.5% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 65th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 66th of 191 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.4% | 33.5% | 8.9% | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 37.1% | 33.5% | 3.6% | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Madagascar or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Madagascar, at 33.6% against 33.5% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Madagascar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Madagascar ranks 65th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 66th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.