Libya vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Libya
27.0%
in 2019
New Zealand
27.2%
in 2019
Libya rank
102nd
New Zealand rank
99th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Libya
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 27.2% against 27.0% in Libya, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Libya or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 27.2% against 27.0% in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Libya and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Libya ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.