Lesotho, Kingdom of vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Lesotho, Kingdom of
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
How they compare
Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 32.1% against 31.3% in Lesotho, Kingdom of, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Marshall Islands, Republic of the has been ahead every year.
Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 71st and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 69th of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands, Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho, Kingdom of | Marshall Islands, Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.3% | 32.1% | 0.8% | Marshall Islands, Republic of the |
| 2010s | 31.3% | 32.1% | 0.8% | Marshall Islands, Republic of the |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Lesotho, Kingdom of or Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 32.1% against 31.3% in Lesotho, Kingdom of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Lesotho, Kingdom of and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 0.8%, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho, Kingdom of and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho, Kingdom of and Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 71st and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 69th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.