Lebanon vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Lebanon
30.8%
in 2019
Sweden
30.4%
in 2019
Lebanon rank
77th
Sweden rank
80th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Lebanon
- Sweden
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 30.8% against 30.4% in Sweden, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sweden ahead.
Lebanon ranks 77th and Sweden ranks 80th of 191 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.8% | 31.3% | 0.5% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 30.8% | 30.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Lebanon or Sweden?
- Lebanon, at 30.8% against 30.4% in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Lebanon and Sweden?
- 0.4%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sweden?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Lebanon ranks 77th and Sweden ranks 80th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.