Latvia vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Latvia
23.1%
in 2019
Mauritania
23.2%
in 2019
Latvia rank
133rd
Mauritania rank
130th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Latvia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 23.2% against 23.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 130th of 190 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.2% | 23.2% | 6.0% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 23.1% | 23.2% | 0.1% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Latvia or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 23.2% against 23.1% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Latvia and Mauritania?
- 0.1%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Latvia ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 130th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.