Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Lao People's Democratic Republic
31.6%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
32.1%
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
70th
Marshall Islands rank
69th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 32.1% against 31.6% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 70th and Marshall Islands ranks 69th of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.6% | 32.1% | 0.5% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 31.6% | 32.1% | 0.5% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 32.1% against 31.6% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Marshall Islands?
- 0.5%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 70th and Marshall Islands ranks 69th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.