Kiribati vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Kiribati
25.8%
in 2019
Singapore
25.8%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
111th
Singapore rank
111th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Kiribati
- Singapore
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 25.8% against 25.8% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 111th and Singapore ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.8% | 20.1% | 5.7% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 25.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Kiribati or Singapore?
- Kiribati, at 25.8% against 25.8% in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Kiribati and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Kiribati ranks 111th and Singapore ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.