Kiribati vs Romania: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Kiribati
25.8%
in 2019
Romania
25.8%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
110th
Romania rank
110th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Kiribati
- Romania
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 25.8% against 25.8% in Romania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 110th and Romania ranks 110th of 190 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.8% | 18.1% | 7.7% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 25.8% | 0.0% | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Kiribati or Romania?
- Kiribati, at 25.8% against 25.8% in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Kiribati and Romania?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Romania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Kiribati ranks 110th and Romania ranks 110th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.