Kiribati vs Morocco: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Kiribati
25.8%
in 2019
Morocco
26.5%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
110th
Morocco rank
107th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Kiribati
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 26.5% against 25.8% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 110th and Morocco ranks 107th of 190 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.8% | 26.5% | 0.7% | Morocco |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 26.5% | 0.7% | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Kiribati or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 26.5% against 25.8% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Kiribati and Morocco?
- 0.7%, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Morocco?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Morocco rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Kiribati ranks 110th and Morocco ranks 107th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.