Kenya vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Kenya
41.8%
in 2019
Peru
41.2%
in 2019
Kenya rank
38th
Peru rank
40th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Kenya
- Peru
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 41.8% against 41.2% in Peru, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Peru ahead.
Kenya ranks 38th and Peru ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.7% | 41.2% | 10.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 41.8% | 41.2% | 0.6% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Kenya or Peru?
- Kenya, at 41.8% against 41.2% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Kenya and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Kenya ranks 38th and Peru ranks 40th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.