Kazakhstan vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Kazakhstan
22.0%
in 2019
Tunisia
21.8%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
141st
Tunisia rank
143rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Kazakhstan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 22.0% against 21.8% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.0% | 21.8% | 0.2% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 22.0% | 21.8% | 0.2% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Kazakhstan or Tunisia?
- Kazakhstan, at 22.0% against 21.8% in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Kazakhstan ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.