Jordan vs Lebanon: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Jordan
31.2%
in 2019
Lebanon
30.8%
in 2019
Jordan rank
73rd
Lebanon rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Jordan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 31.2% against 30.8% in Lebanon, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 73rd and Lebanon ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.2% | 30.8% | 0.4% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 31.2% | 30.8% | 0.4% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Jordan or Lebanon?
- Jordan, at 31.2% against 30.8% in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Jordan and Lebanon?
- 0.4%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lebanon?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Lebanon rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Jordan ranks 73rd and Lebanon ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.