Japan vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Japan
23.4%
in 2019
Lithuania
23.6%
in 2019
Japan rank
127th
Lithuania rank
125th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 23.6% against 23.4% in Japan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 127th and Lithuania ranks 125th of 190 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.2% | 23.6% | 8.6% | Japan |
| 2010s | 26.0% | 23.6% | 2.4% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Japan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 23.6% against 23.4% in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Japan and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Japan ranks 127th and Lithuania ranks 125th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.