Jamaica vs Mali: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Jamaica
50.2%
in 2019
Mali
52.0%
in 2019
Jamaica rank
23rd
Mali rank
21st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Jamaica
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 52.0% against 50.2% in Jamaica, a difference of 1.8%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 23rd and Mali ranks 21st of 190 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.0% | 52.0% | 2.0% | Mali |
| 2010s | 50.1% | 52.0% | 1.9% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Jamaica or Mali?
- Mali, at 52.0% against 50.2% in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Jamaica and Mali?
- 1.8%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mali?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Mali rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Jamaica ranks 23rd and Mali ranks 21st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.