Italy vs Nepal: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Italy
27.6%
in 2019
Nepal
27.3%
in 2019
Italy rank
94th
Nepal rank
97th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Italy
- Nepal
How they compare
Italy currently reports 27.6% against 27.3% in Nepal, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 94th and Nepal ranks 97th of 190 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.4% | 26.8% | 3.6% | Italy |
| 2010s | 27.2% | 26.9% | 0.4% | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Italy or Nepal?
- Italy, at 27.6% against 27.3% in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Italy and Nepal?
- 0.3%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Nepal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Nepal rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Italy ranks 94th and Nepal ranks 97th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.