Israel vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Israel
25.3%
in 2019
Mauritius
25.0%
in 2019
Israel rank
116th
Mauritius rank
117th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Israel currently reports 25.3% against 25.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 116th and Mauritius ranks 117th of 190 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.3% | 16.3% | 9.0% | Israel |
| 2010s | 25.3% | 22.4% | 2.9% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Israel or Mauritius?
- Israel, at 25.3% against 25.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Israel and Mauritius?
- 0.3%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Israel ranks 116th and Mauritius ranks 117th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.