Iraq vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Iraq
28.1%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
27.5%
in 2019
Iraq rank
93rd
Saudi Arabia rank
96th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Iraq
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 28.1% against 27.5% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 93rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.6% | 27.5% | 4.1% | Iraq |
| 2010s | 28.1% | 27.5% | 0.6% | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Iraq or Saudi Arabia?
- Iraq, at 28.1% against 27.5% in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Iraq and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.6%, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Saudi Arabia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iraq and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Iraq ranks 93rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.