Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Iran, Islamic Republic of
19.3%
in 2019
Poland
19.4%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
159th
Poland rank
158th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 19.4% against 19.3% in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 159th and Poland ranks 158th of 190 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 19.0% | 2.0% | Poland |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 19.3% | 1.4% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Poland?
- Poland, at 19.4% against 19.3% in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Poland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 159th and Poland ranks 158th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.