Indonesia vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Indonesia
70.3%
in 2019
Malawi
69.1%
in 2019
Indonesia rank
10th
Malawi rank
11th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Indonesia
- Malawi
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 70.3% against 69.1% in Malawi, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malawi ahead.
Indonesia ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 11th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 135.3% | 142.4% | 7.1% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 89.8% | 76.6% | 13.2% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Indonesia or Malawi?
- Indonesia, at 70.3% against 69.1% in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Indonesia and Malawi?
- 1.2%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Malawi?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Indonesia ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 11th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.