Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Hungary or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Hungary, at 15.0% against 14.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of?

17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hungary vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Hungary

15.0%

in 2019

Tanzania, United Republic of

14.3%

in 2019

Hungary rank

181st

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

184th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

Hungary
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 15.0% against 14.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.7%.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 181st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 184th of 190 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hungary	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	15.0%	14.3%	0.7%	Hungary
2010s	15.0%	14.3%	0.7%	Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Hungary or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Hungary, at 15.0% against 14.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.7%, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?: Hungary ranks 181st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 184th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/hungary/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/hungary/tanzania/">Hungary vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit: % of claim
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.