Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Hong Kong, China
23.6%
in 2019
Switzerland
24.0%
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
126th
Switzerland rank
124th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 24.0% against 23.6% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 126th and Switzerland ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.6% | 22.0% | 1.6% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 23.6% | 24.0% | 0.4% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Hong Kong, China or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 24.0% against 23.6% in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
- 0.4%, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Switzerland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 126th and Switzerland ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.