Honduras vs Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Honduras
38.8%
in 2019
Sierra Leone
39.5%
in 2019
Honduras rank
46th
Sierra Leone rank
44th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Honduras
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 39.5% against 38.8% in Honduras, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 46th and Sierra Leone ranks 44th of 190 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.8% | 149.5% | 110.7% | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 38.8% | 72.5% | 33.7% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Honduras or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 39.5% against 38.8% in Honduras as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Honduras and Sierra Leone?
- 0.7%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Sierra Leone?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Sierra Leone rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Honduras ranks 46th and Sierra Leone ranks 44th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.