Guyana vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Guyana
27.0%
in 2019
New Zealand
27.2%
in 2019
Guyana rank
102nd
New Zealand rank
99th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Guyana
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 27.2% against 27.0% in Guyana, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.2% | 22.1% | 3.1% | Guyana |
| 2010s | 25.7% | 26.2% | 0.5% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Guyana or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 27.2% against 27.0% in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Guyana and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and New Zealand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Guyana ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.