Guinea-Bissau vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Guinea-Bissau
28.0%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
27.5%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
94th
Saudi Arabia rank
96th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 28.0% against 27.5% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.0% | 27.5% | 0.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 28.0% | 27.5% | 0.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Guinea-Bissau or Saudi Arabia?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 28.0% against 27.5% in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Guinea-Bissau and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.5%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.