Guatemala vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Guatemala
26.5%
in 2019
Kiribati
25.8%
in 2019
Guatemala rank
107th
Kiribati rank
110th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Guatemala
- Kiribati
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 26.5% against 25.8% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 107th and Kiribati ranks 110th of 190 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.5% | 25.8% | 0.7% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 26.5% | 25.8% | 0.7% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Guatemala or Kiribati?
- Guatemala, at 26.5% against 25.8% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Guatemala and Kiribati?
- 0.7%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kiribati?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Guatemala ranks 107th and Kiribati ranks 110th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.