Greece vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Greece
22.4%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
22.8%
in 2019
Greece rank
139th
Sri Lanka rank
137th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Greece
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 22.8% against 22.4% in Greece, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 139th and Sri Lanka ranks 137th of 190 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.4% | 22.8% | 0.4% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 22.8% | 0.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Greece or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 22.8% against 22.4% in Greece as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Greece and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Greece and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Greece ranks 139th and Sri Lanka ranks 137th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.