Finland vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Finland
16.2%
in 2019
Seychelles
15.4%
in 2019
Finland rank
174th
Seychelles rank
177th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Finland
- Seychelles
How they compare
Finland currently reports 16.2% against 15.4% in Seychelles, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.
Finland ranks 174th and Seychelles ranks 177th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 14.3% | 1.0% | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 15.4% | 0.5% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Finland or Seychelles?
- Finland, at 16.2% against 15.4% in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Finland and Seychelles?
- 0.8%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Seychelles?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Finland ranks 174th and Seychelles ranks 177th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.