Fiji vs Kenya: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Fiji
42.6%
in 2019
Kenya
41.8%
in 2019
Fiji rank
36th
Kenya rank
38th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Fiji
- Kenya
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 42.6% against 41.8% in Kenya, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 36th and Kenya ranks 38th of 190 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.6% | 30.7% | 11.9% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 42.6% | 41.8% | 0.8% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Fiji or Kenya?
- Fiji, at 42.6% against 41.8% in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Fiji and Kenya?
- 0.8%, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kenya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Fiji and Kenya rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Fiji ranks 36th and Kenya ranks 38th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.