Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of vs Oman: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
- Oman
How they compare
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of currently reports 15.2% against 15.1% in Oman, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 178th and Oman ranks 180th of 190 countries.
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 15.1% | 0.1% | Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 15.1% | 0.1% | Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of or Oman?
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of, at 15.2% against 15.1% in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and Oman?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and Oman rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 178th and Oman ranks 180th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.