Ethiopia vs Hungary: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Ethiopia
15.2%
in 2019
Hungary
15.0%
in 2019
Ethiopia rank
178th
Hungary rank
181st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Ethiopia
- Hungary
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 15.2% against 15.0% in Hungary, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 178th and Hungary ranks 181st of 190 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 15.0% | 0.2% | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 15.0% | 0.2% | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Ethiopia or Hungary?
- Ethiopia, at 15.2% against 15.0% in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Ethiopia and Hungary?
- 0.2%, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Hungary?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Hungary rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Ethiopia ranks 178th and Hungary ranks 181st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.