Eswatini vs Micronesia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Eswatini
56.1%
in 2019
Micronesia
66.0%
in 2019
Eswatini rank
16th
Micronesia rank
13th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Eswatini
- Micronesia
How they compare
Micronesia currently reports 66.0% against 56.1% in Eswatini, a difference of 9.9%.
That makes Micronesia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Micronesia has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 16th and Micronesia ranks 13th of 190 countries.
Micronesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.1% | 66.0% | 9.9% | Micronesia |
| 2010s | 56.1% | 66.0% | 9.9% | Micronesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Eswatini or Micronesia?
- Micronesia, at 66.0% against 56.1% in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Eswatini and Micronesia?
- 9.9%, with Micronesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Micronesia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Micronesia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Eswatini ranks 16th and Micronesia ranks 13th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.