Estonia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Estonia
17.3%
in 2019
Thailand
16.9%
in 2019
Estonia rank
168th
Thailand rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Estonia
- Thailand
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 17.3% against 16.9% in Thailand, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 168th and Thailand ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.7% | 12.4% | 5.3% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 20.0% | 15.1% | 4.9% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Estonia or Thailand?
- Estonia, at 17.3% against 16.9% in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Estonia and Thailand?
- 0.4%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Estonia ranks 168th and Thailand ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.