Eritrea vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Eritrea
16.6%
in 2019
Thailand
16.9%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
171st
Thailand rank
170th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Eritrea
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 16.9% against 16.6% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 171st and Thailand ranks 170th of 190 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.6% | 12.4% | 4.2% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 15.1% | 1.5% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Eritrea or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 16.9% against 16.6% in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Eritrea and Thailand?
- 0.3%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Thailand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Eritrea ranks 171st and Thailand ranks 170th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.