Eritrea vs Spain: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Eritrea
16.6%
in 2019
Spain
17.2%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
169th
Spain rank
166th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Eritrea
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 17.2% against 16.6% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 169th and Spain ranks 166th of 188 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.6% | 17.2% | 0.6% | Spain |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 17.7% | 1.1% | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Eritrea or Spain?
- Spain, at 17.2% against 16.6% in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Eritrea and Spain?
- 0.6%, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Spain?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Spain rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and Spain ranks 166th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.